Mold in CA Senate Bill 655
Or CA SB 655 went into effect January 2016.

​A person can contact the Fair Housing Foundation in California. They can assist if there is a moisture or mold issue in the home. By law in CA a landlord has to maintain the property free of dampness and mold per the CA SB 655 that went into effect about 3 years ago. Of course this refers to items that are their responsibility and not the tenants. If the landlord tries to force a person to move due to this type of event, that is viewed as 'retaliation' and basically can nullify any vacate notice. The landlord is obligated to fix a problem that is their responsibility.
An example of what is not the landlord's responsibility is: a tenant fails to clean the tub for a period of time (say a month) and mold starts growing as a result. This is not the landlord's responsibility.
Say on the other hand one notices what appears to be visible mold growing on the drywall under a sink or mushrooms growing out of the wall due to moisture or water having leaked into the wall, this would be the landlord's responsibility.
If a person wants to confirm that there may be a moisture/mold issue then a company like mine can be hired to inspect (and take samples if needed). If the inspection reveals the issue is the landlord's responsibility then the tenant (by law) can get credited the expense of the inspection and sampling as the tenant is allowed to 'repair and deduct' twice per year if the landlord fails to take action.
Since this type of event is a 'health issue' you have every right to hire an inspector for mold/moisture issues without the landlord's permission or consultation. Contact me for further information if needed.

One example of a mold 'Unfriendly' to people is a genus  called Stachybotrys which is in the family of Stachybotryaceae.  Because of the color normally being black this particular mold type is what has become known as toxic black mold.  However, it is important to know that not all species in this genus of Stachybotrys are considered unfriendly or harmful to people.

At any rate the ones that can be toxic depends on how contact is made with the mold and a person's immune system. One person can have an allergic reaction when this touches their skin and a rash may occur depending on the sensitivity of the person. 

The most extreme example can be this: A person fresh out of a lung transplant who inhales one or two spores from this genus (of the ones that are considered potentially harmful) can die.  This is the extreme case where the average person inhaling a couple of spores from this genus will not be affected at all. But affects will vary from person to person based on their individual immune response and the amount of mold spores and type the person is exposed to.
Mycotoxins from mold can also play a part.  These are produced by molds to 'combat' other molds in the area which I like to refer to Mold Warfare. Notice some affects below.
Long-term mold exposure, even if it doesn't cause immediate symptoms, may also lead to:

• losing your hair.
• anxiety.
• confusion or memory loss.
• numbness in hands and feet.
• stomach pains.
• sensitivity to light.
• gaining weight for no reason.
• muscle cramps.

​If a person has concerns on any of this it is best to consult your doctor.  More next time.

I said I would talk more about mold spores. I want to put this in a balanced context as much as possible. However, due to many people having sensitivities to various molds and other health factors it is a challenge.
Keep in mind mold spores are always in the air we breath since these grow outside and will naturally be inside our homes since the air outside will come inside the home.
We all breath in mold spores of various types every day. Our lungs will naturally dispose of these like it does other intruders. If we breath in too many then our aveoli (air sacs in the lungs) can be overwhelmed and it will cause us problems. Much of this depends on the person and their immune system.
I like to compare this to cooking over a grill where on occasion we may breath in a puff of smoke and be briefly affected by it. But if we are surrounded by smoke, that will naturally overwhelm our system. It is similar with mold spores. We just can't see them unless there is a large number of them. Depending on the person over time sensitivities/allergies to certain molds can develop such as breathing difficulties and more.
Most of the time we go through our day and think little to nothing of this. And many people may be affected very little by this if seemingly at all. As you may realize at this point it is important to be aware of the possible dangers involved. More on the next post

​This can seem a little complicated the first time you go through it.  Some of this I may have covered on a previous blog.  But because I keep running into this when I go on inspections I want to help people understand what they need to do in this process of a potential insurance claim especially if mold may be involved.
Each insurance company has a policy on mold coverage and it it is important for you to know what that coverage is for your particular insurance company and your particular policy.  Realistically, most people don't know what their coverage is until they actually have a potential claim and then they have to call their agent and investigate to find out what their coverage actually is.  Keep in mind when calling your agent they are not an employee of the insurance company. Their primary job is to sell you or provide you with coverage options for your insurance.  And they cannot make a decision whether you have coverage on a particular issue or not.  That would be the adjuster's job.
Many times insurance companies, through their agents, will discourage making a claim so they can keep their payouts lower.  They may say things like 'if you file this claim then the risk of your policy being cancelled goes up'.  Although, this might be true, it does not always reflect what will actually happen.  It is true the more claims that are made in a short period, say in 3 years time, will likely result in your policy being cancelled so you need to decide which claims are more important to file.  Normally you want to have a larger claim filed as opposed to filing claims for smaller amounts say like 2 or $3000 depending on your particular situation.  
In my experience of handling insurance claims in water damage since 2005 it is usually best to report that you have found a leak of some sort as opposed to  saying 'I have mold in my house'.  Insurance companies that cover mold will normally have a cap on the mold coverage.  For example, State Farm has a cap of $5000 to cover anything related to mold Including repairs related to mold. Where the insurance company Farmers does not cover mold, yet they will cover any repairs related to mold after the mold remediation has been completed.
However, that is not the same as water mitigation or dry out services. Anything to do with water mitigation or dry out services is handled separately as a different expense although it may be in the same claim.  And the cap on water damage services is normally the policy limit whatever that limit may be.  Say, up to the value of the house.    
One more point I want to make is this:
Sometimes using  an approved vendor or a vendor Of a particular insurance company is not always the best way to go.  There are several reasons for this to consider In your particular situation.

1. The vendor is normally paid directly by the insurance company for doing work in your house and  has a contract with  the insurance company Abiding by their rules and policy procedures. That is if they want to keep getting work from them.
2. The vendor is also working for you as you have to sign an authorization for them to work in your house. This creates a conflict of interest between what the insurance company wants and what you want.  At least to some extent.
3. Contractors not on the approved vendor list for an insurance company are still authorized by law to do work on your house and be paid for their services in an insurance claim either by the insurance company or by you once insurance company pays you for the Loss.  There can be an advantage in doing this for you, the consumer, as the contractor does not have to abide by the rules and policies of any particular insurance company but they do a abide by the general rules and principles in the industry.  You have the right to choose who does work on your house and the insurance company still has to pay you the fair market value of whatever the damage is  to repair your house.

Please contact me so I can give you a free initial consultation on what may be best for your particular situation.  

Going to Court over a mold issue requires proper evidence. You need an inspector who is certified for mold and can do mold testing or sampling. In addition to the written report you will receive from the inspector the inspector will need to be in court to validate the report. This basically means that he is telling the court that he/she did the inspection and wrote the report. The inspector will also be deposed or questioned to confirm his/her credentials and the experience the inspector has by the lawyers present. Without the inspector being present in court then the written report will be of no value as the court can dismiss it. ​

Starting on April 7, 2018 a leak occurred in the wall between a garage and the kitchen at the hot water heater stand with the air handler/furnace were also located. The leak was fixed by the landlord just 2 days after being noticed by the tenant. However, the landlord left the area soaking wet. This is significant in that the uniform housing code says the property (rental in this case) must be maintained free of dampness and mold. Of course, dampness leads to mold growth and bacteria growth when not attended to promptly. The owner did not want to spend money or bring in a professional to dry the area as needed. The tenant dried the area with equipment on hand but the leak had possibly been going on for some 2 to 4 weeks by the time it was noticed due to the fact that the area experienced rain for several weeks which disguised the leak. It took about 7 days for the area to dry. A 2nd leak occurred in the same area about 3 weeks later on April 28.
Same thing happened again; the leak was repaired but the area was left soaking wet again. This time it took about 5 days to dry now that the weather was a little warmer.
But then some 7 weeks later on June 22nd the tenant was asked to vacate the property with a 60 day notice. Under normal circumstances this can be considered normal. 
Next time I will talk about why this particular notice was not considered normal or legal.